Let Your Mentors Do the Coaching
You don’t have to spend a lot of money to create a sustainable professional development program that will successfully impact student learning. You have the people and the means in your own organization to make it happen. The challenge for you in creating a coaching and mentoring program will be determining the program goals, choosing and training the right people as mentors, providing the appropriate incentives, creating relevant resources, and finding time to develop and implement your program.
Definition of Coaching
Coaching is customized, relevant, and focused support for classroom teachers. It is a more personal approach than whole group workshops where a wide range of participant abilities can leave beginners lost and advanced users frustrated. Coaching provides individuals and small groups the opportunity to learn just what they need when they need it. Teachers become more motivated to act on new skills learned because coaching is ongoing and personal. It has been demonstrated that guidance is essential for successful innovation of technology. (Zhao et al., 2001) The mentor can then provide relevant support materials, model lessons using technology, and give feedback that the teacher will be able to use to go the next step.
Determine Goals
The coaching process is an ongoing process that involves building trust while developing a relationship between mentor and teacher. If you are building your coaching program as part of a grant with a one- or two-year timeline, develop realistic expectations. Determine if the program is meant to target specific grade levels, focus on a curriculum area, or help the entire school. Start small and build a model that can be replicated. Goals can vary, depending on the needs of your school or organization: increasing technology skills, developing lessons or projects, solving problems, or improving teaching practice. If the coaching program only benefits the mentors or does not focus on what teachers teach and what students need to know and do, teachers will not put in the effort needed to make the program work. Be SMART (Eaton & Johnston, 2001) when designing goals for your program.
- Specific: include everyone in the decision to ensure consensus on the goals.
- Measured: define who will be targeted, what they will achieve, and by when.
- Achievable: make sure the goal is realistic and achievable in the time allowed.
- Relevant: ensure that the goal meets the goals of the school improvement plan.
- Timed: develop a timeline that includes who is responsible for what by when.
Here are two examples of coaching program goals:
Goal 1: By the end of the school year fourth- and fifth-grade teachers will map the curriculum and create activities that use technology and increase student literacy and math skills with the support of their assigned mentor.
Tech & Learning Newsletter
Tools and ideas to transform education. Sign up below.
Goal 2: By the end of the semester, each core department for the sixth- and seventh-grades will form a team with a mentor and one to two teachers to co-author an activity focused on their standards-based curriculum that will serve as a model for their colleagues.
Choose the Right People
The most technology-savvy teacher may not always be the best mentor. Unsuccessful coaching programs have mentors with goals that differ from the program goals. The characteristics of a good mentor include:
- good listening skills and empathy
- effective classroom management techniques
- basic technology skills
- expertise in a curriculum area
- being humble, yet motivational
- persistence without being intrusive.
There are good mentors that have a difficult time coaching their colleagues or being accepted by them. It takes unique individuals to work with their colleagues. The saying “you’re not a prophet in your own land†can ring true for some mentors. You may want the mentors from one school to work with another school in the district. Even if you are a small school, choose more than one mentor so they can bounce ideas off each other. Look for people who complement each other’s areas of expertise: a curriculum leader and technology teacher. Ask possible candidates to provide evidence demonstrating how they use technology with students.
Provide Incentives
There are teachers that will offer to coach their colleagues without incentives. However, being a mentor in addition to doing their full-time job will take extra effort and time beyond the school day. You want to keep the mentors, so show you value them.
- Give the mentors a laptop with a wireless Internet connection so they will be able to create projects and communicate with their teachers at any time.
- Offer several release days for planning with other mentors.
- Send them to technology and curriculum conferences so they keep current on innovative teaching practices.
- Provide them a coach for their own support and professional growth.
- Find money for stipends for time spent on planning and coaching beyond the school day.
- Goals – determine outcomes
- Reality – understand the situation
- Options – review choices available
- When – agree on individual learning plan
Each teacher going through this process will develop his/her own individual learning plan (ILP) and how coaching will best support reaching his/her goals. This will require some rethinking about their traditional responsibilities. Rather than providing knowledge, teachers will use the coaching process as a model to guide, facilitate, and mentor students. A coaching program with your own teachers and mentors builds a growing learning community. Mentors and teachers develop a feeling of ownership and pride when the program works – especially when teaching practice incorporates the coaching model.
This article first appeared in OnCUE April 2004 – Vol. 26 – No. 2 p. 18-19 .
Resources
Eaton, J. and Johnson, R. Coaching Successfully. Dorling Kindersley. New York. 2001. ISBN # 0-7894-7147-7.
Schacter, J. The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. 1999.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations: Executive summary. Teachers College Record, 104 (3) 482-515.